Beta
  • With such a wealth of information here at SWAN, we want to make it easier for you to find the knowledge you seek as quickly as possible.

  • Lighthouse uses some of the most advanced AI language models to understand your questions and sifts through SWAN's entire knowledge base to find an answer. We have carefully trained it to present relevant information in a consolidated way.

  • As you navigate an ocean of information, let Lighthouse be your beacon.

  • Disclaimer: We cannot always guarantee complete or accurate responses, given that AI-powered dialogue is still an emerging technology. Lighthouse will always accompany answers with the most relevant references, which we encourage you to check out. We highly value your feedback to ensure that Lighthouse meets the highest standards of quality and reliability. If you notice something off, please contact us at: info@swan-forum.com.

  • Ready to join us?

    SWAN Members enjoy full access to Lighthouse (unlimited searches and gated content) along with global membership benefits.

Looking for classic search?

Case Study

Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District

Fast Growing California County Streamlines MS4 Complexity

AUTHOR

Related Topics

Water Quality Monitoring

Flood Mitigation

Regulatory Compliance

Located in Southern California in the western portion of the county of the same name, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District was formed in 1945. The regional drainage authority is responsible for keeping residents safe from damaging or destructive flood and storm waters.

The District operates drainage services within a 2,700 square mile jurisdiction. It also performs floodplain management and development review, flood warning and early detection, and National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) compliance. Riverside County ranked #3 in population growth among large counties nationwide.

THE CHALLENGE

The MS4 regulatory program manages storm water quality from urban runoff to prevent impacts to receiving waters within respective jurisdictions. Meeting stringent Quality Assurance (QA) requirements and compliance reporting are the most time-consuming and most critical aspects of the program. 

Strict adherence to QA project plans mandates an excessive collection and storage of meta data – from discrete grab sampling events at specific locations and times to thorough review of lab analyses for particular constituents. 

Additional complexities include: 

  • Managing a large inventory of monitoring locations specially selected to address different objectives of watershed-specific monitoring program component
  • Mixed frequency of and approach to each monitoring event at each site, from 1 to 6 times per year, in order to address the prescribed components of each permit 
  • During each field visit, staff may collect information for up to 80 different data fields 
  • Collecting thousands of water quality data points during wet and dry weather monitoring in one year 
  • Maintaining auditable chain of custody (COC) documents and lab results

THE SOLUTION

First, to ensure field staff collect all mandatory and relevant data during each field visit, the District equipped personnel with mobile devices and data collection app, Survey 123 for ArcGIS by Esri. Employees are guided through a customised form using logic and standardised responses. They have options to attach images and videos. The app confirms sampling locations, reduces transcription errors and saves time as staff return to the office and readily import data into KISTERS’ Water Quality data management system. 

Then, KISTERS’ water quality platform tracks a wide array of parameters, ensuring data completeness and achieving appropriate objectives, and automates a significant part of the data workflow: 

  • Download of lab EDD files from ftp, email, web, and other sources 
  • Verification of actual lab results and ordered lab analysis and usage of approved vocabulary 
  • Analysis of reporting limits, objectives and NPDES permit requirements 
  • Maintain strict control over data quality using audit trails

Extensive storage of meta data required by the District’s Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Regulatory Program can also track changes over time to sampling conditions at particular sites, collection and field processing methods, analytical and observational methods, and more. 

RESULTS

Time Savings. Accuracy. Confidence. 

District personnel will be able to reallocate their time and attention to more pressing needs and responsibilities. Automated data validation and verification rules will process water quality data for format, vocabulary, and reporting of errors and warnings to regulatory program staff members. 

The suite of streamlined tools will give District professionals new capabilities to generate more comprehensive reports, increasing confidence that decision-makers have the highest quality information. Significant time savings over the manual validation process is expected, especially as Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District serves a growing number of residents and businesses.

Featured SWAN Members: