Beta
  • With such a wealth of information here at SWAN, we want to make it easier for you to find the knowledge you seek as quickly as possible.

  • Lighthouse uses some of the most advanced AI language models to understand your questions and sifts through SWAN's entire knowledge base to find an answer. We have carefully trained it to present relevant information in a consolidated way.

  • As you navigate an ocean of information, let Lighthouse be your beacon.

  • Disclaimer: We cannot always guarantee complete or accurate responses, given that AI-powered dialogue is still an emerging technology. Lighthouse will always accompany answers with the most relevant references, which we encourage you to check out. We highly value your feedback to ensure that Lighthouse meets the highest standards of quality and reliability. If you notice something off, please contact us at: info@swan-forum.com.

  • Ready to join us?

    SWAN Members enjoy full access to Lighthouse (unlimited searches and gated content) along with global membership benefits.

Looking for classic search?

Jan. 3, 2023

Building Trust into Smart Water Agreements

By Dr. Amir Cahn, SWAN CEO 

Water utilities need to secure reliable infrastructure, yet often lack the internal capacity to do so, thus gaining support from external partners is becoming increasingly important. 

In service arrangements, contracts and relationships must serve as compliments. A poorly written contract cannot be overcome by friendly account managers while substandard contracts generally make for poor relationships. Therefore, trust is really the glue between contracts and relationships.

Trust is a combination of integrity, reliability, and mutual caring, beneficial to all types of partnerships that face risk and require constant flexibility. However, very high trust partnerships sometimes fail to innovate. If a team enjoys a high-level of trust and mutual caring, there may be too much compromise. In such cases, a team member would prefer to please his partner rather than to openly question the partner’s ideas, decisions, and actions.

There are many ways a water utility can approach a service contract, which fall into two main categories: supplier product support and customer process support. Product support services can include basic maintenance or preventive services and customer support can include training, workshops, and in-depth collaboration.

In certain cases, customers may be more inclined to take a passive role, for example relying on autonomous, remote monitoring or advanced telematics (e.g. LoRa or Sigfox) managed directly by the service provider. Similarly, some customers may lack time, resources, or incentives to be actively engaged. In other cases, customers may be heavily involved in service deployment, integrating their internal skills, staff, and time to learn about the offering in order to achieve the best outcomes and upskill their workforce. 

The table below shows a helpful visualisation of the different types of service relationships as referenced in the 4C framework developed by Carlborg et al. (2018). It shows examples of passive vs. active customers and the critical success factors for each relational mode: Caretaker, Constructor, Cicerone (Facilitator), and Consultant. 

Source: Adapted from the 4C framework: Carlborg, P., Kindström, D., & Kowalkowski, C. (2018). “Servitization practices: A co-creation taxonomy.”

Application to the Water Sector

  • Caretaker: Usually relating to capital-intensive products, the customer is willing to allow a knowledgeable party take care of its problems or manage the equipment in question. Within the water sector, this applies to the Data-as-Service (DaaS) model, in which a technology supplier operates and maintains certain hardware equipment to collect, transmit, and process data and the utility only pays for the final results. 
  • Constructor: The customer is less inclined to commit its own resources (staff, knowledge), so the supplier engages more actively with the customer’s processes. Within the water sector, this relates to Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) solutions, in which a technology supplier must develop deep skills to systematically measure and learn about the customer’s situation and internal processes.
  • Cicerone (Facilitator): The supplier engages and guides the customer, who then becomes increasingly able to manage the situations alone. Within the water sector, this is performed by industry forums such as the SWAN Forum, Cleveland Water Alliance, and specialised experts.
  • Consultant: The customer actively contributes its own resources and labour to solve unique challenges in collaboration with the supplier. This may include building teams of operatives that can work together at different levels of management. Within the water sector, this applies to design engineering and consulting firms. 

To be successful, each of these roles depends on effective collaboration and co-creating value. Directly linked to this is the core issue of trust. Can water utilities fully trust technology providers? What is the “right” level of trust, and can there be too much trust?

Trust Webinars

If you are interested in this topic, we encourage you to watch the below webinars on “Building Trust: From Project Design to Implementation,” and Building Trust: Connecting Communities And Utilities” hosted by the SWAN Americas Alliance and Cleveland Water Alliance. 

Featuring:

  • Sarah Parker, Project Manager, Water Quality and Environmental (American Water)
    • Sahil Chaini, Customer Success Leader (Transcend)
    • Steve Green, Digital Water – Practice Leader (Stanley Consultants)

    Featuring:

    • Liz Barlik, Public Affairs & Communications Manager (Cleveland Water)
    • Melissa Mays, Organizations Manager (FlintRising)
    • Scott Berry, Director of Policy & Government Relations (US Water Alliance)